Our parashah is defined by a dramatic event, one that transforms the desert experience from a fleeting stop on the short journey from Egypt to Israel into a lengthy period that spans a generation.
The lengthening of the days in the desert indeed ensures that those who left Egypt will not enter the land. But perhaps more significantly, the desert sojourn is not just the story of a band of former slaves merging their tribal identities into the makings of a sovereign people.
It also presents as the story of a changing God: one who initially responds with immediacy and emotion, but who comes to anchor the human-divine relationship in a fundamentally different way.
The story of the spies begins with a group of individuals who go to scout out the land on God’s command.
The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Send men to scout the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the Israelite people; send one man from each of their ancestral tribes, each one a chieftain among them.” So Moses, by the Lord’s command, sent them out from the wilderness of Paran, all the men being leaders of the Israelites.
The men that Moshe sends on this mission are formally described as the leaders of the nation, but the Torah’s description of them gives off an air of parochial individualism: “send one man from each of their ancestral tribes, each one a chieftain among them.” They have no single leader, rather “They were all men, the heads of the Israelites.” It is therefore perhaps not surprising that the entire journey is described in the singular, as the response to the needs of a single person – Moshe: “Send for yourself.” And the story in fact continues: “Moshe…sent them.” The spies are not sent off with any formal ceremony or wishes for a safe journey. The spies’ departure has no communal dimension.
But things change when the spies return:
At the end of forty days they returned from scouting the land. They went straight to Moses and Aaron and the whole community of Israel at Kadesh in the wilderness of Paran, and they made their report to them and to the whole community, as they showed them the fruit of the land.
The spies approach the entire “community of Israel” and deliver their report not as “one man each, one man each” nor to their respective tribes, nor just to Moshe, but as a group to the entire nation, to the entire community of Israel.
And then an internal argument breaks out within the group.
Caleb hushed the people before Moses and said, “Let us by all means go up, and we shall gain possession of it, for we shall surely overcome it.” But the men who had gone up with him said, “We cannot attack that people, for it is stronger than we.” Thus they spread calumnies (slander) among the Israelites about the land they had scouted, saying, “The country that we traversed and scouted is one that devours its settlers. All the people that we saw in it are men of great size; we saw the Nephilim there – the Anakites are part of the Nephilim – and we looked like grasshoppers to ourselves, and so we must have looked to them.”
The Torah presents the spies’ words in a critical light: “Thus they spread calumnies (slander) among the Israelites about the land they had scouted” (BeMidbar 13:32). Not only do the spies transform into a unified group with a nearly singular identity, but from the moment they return, Israel is also described as one community. They are no longer separate tribes, each with its own leader, but rather a unified group with a single voice.
The whole community broke into loud cries, and the people wept that night. All the Israelites railed against Moses and Aaron. “If only we had died in the land of Egypt,” the whole community shouted at them, “or if only we might die in this wilderness! Why is the Lord taking us to that land to fall by the sword? Our wives and children will be carried off! It would be better for us to go back to Egypt!”
Now, the entire community, which no longer believes that the project of entering the land is feasible or realistic, is opposed to individuals who think otherwise. And the argument between the two sides reaches a turning point: the dispute is no longer over the land, its qualities and the ability of the community of Israel to conquer it. Rather, the discussion is over God’s power to bring the people safely into the land.
Then Moses and Aaron fell on their faces before all the assembled congregation of the Israelites. And Joshua son of Nun and Caleb son of Jephunneh, of those who had scouted the land, rent their clothes and exhorted the whole Israelite community: “The land that we traversed and scouted is an exceedingly good land. If the Lord is pleased with us, He will bring us into that land, a land that flows with milk and honey, and give it to us; only you must not rebel against the Lord. Have no fear then of the people of the country, for they are our prey: their protection has departed from them, but the Lord is with us. Have no fear of them!”
Moshe, Aharon, and two of the spies resist the lack of faith in God, but Israel’s response is, “The whole community threatened to pelt them with stones…” (BeMidbar 14:10).
Only when the argument reaches this climax does God intervene directly: “the Presence of the Lord appeared in the Tent of Meeting to all the Israelites” (BeMidbar 14:10). The description of the divine reaction reveals how God interprets what has happened.
And the Lord said to Moses, “How long will this people spurn Me, and how long will they have no faith in Me despite all the signs that I have performed in their midst? I will strike them with pestilence and disown them, and I will make of you a nation far more numerous than they!”
Israel’s reaction is taken by God as an act of rebellion against Him, as a lack of faith in the project of entering the land as presented by God. God is furious; the rest of the chapter depicts Moshe’s frantic efforts to placate and persuade God, who ultimately agrees to forgive them.
Pardon, I pray, the iniquity of this people according to Your great kindness, as You have forgiven this people ever since Egypt.” And the Lord said, “I pardon, as you have asked.
Despite God’s apparent forgiveness of the Israelite collective, He does not forgive the individuals who did not have faith in Him. In what seems like a moment of divine rage and pain, God determines that the men who rebelled against him will not have any part in the project of entering the land.
Nevertheless, as I live and as the Lord’s Presence fills the whole world, none of the men who have seen My Presence and the signs that I have performed in Egypt and in the wilderness, and who have tried Me these many times and have disobeyed Me, shall see the land that I promised on oath to their fathers; none of those who spurn Me shall see it.
This reaction is portrayed as personal – those who rejected God will not see the land:
The Lord spoke further to Moses and Aaron, “How much longer shall that wicked community keep muttering against Me? Very well, I have heeded the incessant muttering of the Israelites against Me. Say to them: ‘As I live,’ says the Lord, ‘I will do to you just as you have urged Me. In this very wilderness shall your carcasses drop. Of all of you who were recorded in your various lists from the age of twenty years up, you who have muttered against Me.
The story leaves the community of Israel not only in a state of mourning, knowing that they will not enter the land, but also with the knowledge that their God is one who gets insulted, who rages and punishes. In other words, Israel at this moment exists in the shadow of a threat that an entire generation might be wiped out because of their God’s rage.
The people are under a heavy cloud: divine rage could consume an entire generation on account of a mistake, an inappropriate lack of faith or a mistaken assessment of facts that God finds insulting. Maybe this is precisely why it cannot be the end of the story: Just as, after the flood, God promises not to bring another flood upon the earth, the laws that immediately follow the story of the spies represent a shift in the relationship between God and the community of Israel.
First, the parashah ends with a series of laws that begin with the phrase “When you come into the land where you shall dwell” – a kind of promise that God’s anger and punishment are ephemeral. There will indeed be a generation of Israel that will see the land. Second, another law opens a future pathway for grappling with communal sin, an alternative to wiping out an entire generation:
If you unwittingly fail to observe any one of the commandments that the Lord has declared to Moses – anything that the Lord has enjoined upon you through Moses-from the day that the Lord gave the commandment and on through the ages: If this was done unwittingly, through the inadvertence of the community, the whole community shall present one bull of the herd as a burnt offering of pleasing odor to the Lord, with its proper meal offering and libation, and one he-goat as a sin offering. The priest shall make expiation for the whole Israelite community and they shall be forgiven; for it was an error, and for their error they have brought their offering, an offering by fire to the Lord and their sin offering before the Lord. The whole Israelite community and the stranger residing among them shall be forgiven, for it happened to the entire people through error.
This last verse echoes Moshe’s request for forgiveness from God after the sin of the spies, but there are several significant differences. First, this is no one-time response to an outstanding leader of the stature of Moshe, rather an established protocol that can be put into play by any priest in any generation, and perhaps, by extension, by any communal leader. Second, alongside the awareness that the people of Israel may sin in its entirety sits the recognition of the possibility of forgiveness that can follow in this sin’s wake. And this forgiveness need not be conditional on the death of the generation of sinners.
The description of the sin of the spies and their punishment is juxtaposed with a series of laws. This juxtaposition is evidence of two processes that the sin of the spies both enhances and clarifies. First, we have here another significant step in the transformation of the Israelites from a collection of individuals into a community, the community of Israel. Second, the relationship between the community of Israel and God is reorganized, and this reorganization is geared specifically toward moments of crisis and lack of trust.
Through this reorganization, the qualities of the parties themselves change. We see that the sin of the spies is also a milestone not only in the unfolding character of the Jewish people, but also in God’s willingness to grant them the tools to find atonement for the future sins both He and they know they will commit.
You care about Israel, peoplehood, and vibrant, ethical Jewish communities. We do too.
Join our email list for more Hartman ideas
